Skip to content
VidiMaster it, module by module
Module 6/Conditional Probability & Independence

Independence

Two events are independent when knowing one tells you nothing about the other: P(A∩B) = P(A)·P(B).

Before you start — give these a try

Attempting first primes your brain for the lesson — even if you miss. Nothing is graded or saved; it's just a warm-up.

Events AA and BB are independent with P(A)=0.4P(A) = 0.4 and P(B)=0.25P(B) = 0.25. Find P(A∪B)P(A\cup B) as a decimal.

Two events AA and BB each have positive probability and are mutually exclusive (disjoint). Which statement is correct?

What you’ll be able to do

  • State the definition of independence, P(A∩B)=P(A) P(B)P(A\cap B) = P(A)\,P(B), and its conditional form P(A∣B)=P(A)P(A\mid B) = P(A).
  • Test whether two given events are independent by comparing P(A∩B)P(A\cap B) with P(A) P(B)P(A)\,P(B).
  • Distinguish independence from mutual exclusivity, and explain why disjoint events with positive probability are never independent.
  • Use independence to compute P(A∩B)P(A\cap B) and P(A∪B)P(A\cup B), including the complement trick P(at least one)=1−∏(1−P(⋅))P(\text{at least one}) = 1 - \prod(1-P(\cdot)).
  • Contrast pairwise independence with mutual independence for three or more events.

In your course

· MATH2015 · Linear Algebra & Probability
§11.3 Independence
  • Definition 11.3Independent events
    AA and BB are independent if P(A∩B)=P(A) P(B)P(A\cap B) = P(A)\,P(B).
  • Proposition 11.3Independence of complements
    If A,BA,B are independent, so are Ac,BA^c,B; A,BcA,B^c; and Ac,BcA^c,B^c.
  • Definition 11.4Mutual independence
    Every sub-collection of the events factorizes; strictly stronger than pairwise independence.
  • Example 11.7Drawing with vs without replacement
  • Example 11.8Pairwise but not mutually independent
Grounded in §11.3. The independence definition, Proposition 11.3, the mutual-vs-pairwise distinction, and Examples 11.7–11.8 are all from the source text; all numeric answers were recomputed with exact fractions.
1

The definition of independence

Conditional probability P(A∣B)P(A\mid B) measures how the occurrence of BB changes the probability of AA. If that probability is unchanged — P(A∣B)=P(A)P(A\mid B) = P(A) — we say AA is independent of BB. Substituting the definition P(A∣B)=P(A∩B)P(B)P(A\mid B) = \dfrac{P(A\cap B)}{P(B)} and rearranging gives the symmetric form.

Definition 11.3. Events AA and BB are independent if P(A∩B)=P(A) P(B).P(A\cap B) = P(A)\,P(B).

This version is symmetric in AA and BB and needs no assumption that P(B)>0P(B) > 0. When P(A)>0P(A) > 0 it also follows that P(B∣A)=P(B)P(B\mid A) = P(B) — the knowledge runs both ways. Independence is only meaningful for events in the same sample space; it makes no sense to ask whether events from unrelated experiments are independent.

2

Independent is not the same as mutually exclusive

These two ideas are often confused, but they are almost opposites. Mutually exclusive (disjoint) events cannot both happen: A∩B=∅A\cap B = \varnothing, so P(A∩B)=0P(A\cap B) = 0. Independent events satisfy P(A∩B)=P(A) P(B)P(A\cap B) = P(A)\,P(B).

If AA and BB are disjoint and both have positive probability, then P(A∩B)=0P(A\cap B) = 0 but P(A) P(B)>0P(A)\,P(B) > 0, so they are not independent. In fact, for disjoint events knowing that AA occurred tells you BB definitely did not — that is maximal dependence, not independence.

3

Complements of independent events stay independent

Proposition 11.3. If AA and BB are independent, then so are AcA^c and BB, AA and BcB^c, and AcA^c and BcB^c.

The idea: A∩BA\cap B and Ac∩BA^c\cap B are disjoint and together make up BB, so P(Ac∩B)=P(B)−P(A∩B)=P(B)−P(A)P(B)=(1−P(A))P(B)=P(Ac) P(B)P(A^c\cap B) = P(B) - P(A\cap B) = P(B) - P(A)P(B) = (1-P(A))P(B) = P(A^c)\,P(B). This is what lets us use the complement trick for independent events: the probability that at least one of several independent events occurs is P ⁣(⋃iAi)=1−∏i(1−P(Ai)),P\!\left(\bigcup_i A_i\right) = 1 - \prod_i \bigl(1 - P(A_i)\bigr), because the non-occurrences are independent too.

4

Pairwise vs mutual independence

For more than two events, independence is subtler. Events A1,…,AnA_1,\dots,A_n are mutually independent if every sub-collection factorizes: for all 2≤k≤n2 \le k \le n, P(Ai1∩⋯∩Aik)=P(Ai1)⋯P(Aik)P(A_{i_1}\cap\cdots\cap A_{i_k}) = P(A_{i_1})\cdots P(A_{i_k}). For three events A,B,CA,B,C this means all four conditions hold: the three pairwise products and P(A∩B∩C)=P(A)P(B)P(C)P(A\cap B\cap C) = P(A)P(B)P(C).

They are pairwise independent if only every pair is independent. Pairwise independence is strictly weaker: it does not imply mutual independence (Example 11.8 below).

Definition 11.3 — Independent events

Events AA and BB are independent if P(A∩B)=P(A) P(B)P(A\cap B) = P(A)\,P(B). Equivalently, when P(B)>0P(B) > 0, if P(A∣B)=P(A)P(A\mid B) = P(A).

Intuition. Learning that BB happened does not move the probability of AA at all. The joint probability is just the product of the two separate probabilities.
Conditional characterization

If P(B)>0P(B) > 0, then AA and BB are independent if and only if P(A∣B)=P(A)P(A\mid B) = P(A); and if P(A)>0P(A) > 0 this is equivalent to P(B∣A)=P(B)P(B\mid A) = P(B).

Intuition. Independence is symmetric: if BB carries no information about AA, then AA carries no information about BB.
Proposition 11.3 — Independence of complements

If AA and BB are independent, then so are the pairs AcA^c and BB, AA and BcB^c, and AcA^c and BcB^c.

Intuition. If BB tells you nothing about whether AA occurs, it tells you nothing about whether AA fails either — so complements inherit independence.
Definition 11.4 — Mutual independence

Events A1,…,AnA_1,\dots,A_n are mutually independent if for every subset {Ai1,…,Aik}\{A_{i_1},\dots,A_{i_k}\} with 2≤k≤n2\le k\le n, P(Ai1∩⋯∩Aik)=P(Ai1)⋯P(Aik)P(A_{i_1}\cap\cdots\cap A_{i_k}) = P(A_{i_1})\cdots P(A_{i_k}). They are pairwise independent if this holds for every pair.

Intuition. Mutual independence demands that every combination factorizes, not just pairs — a genuinely stronger requirement.

Worked examples

Example 1

An urn has 4 red and 7 green balls. Draw two balls with replacement. Let A={first is red}A = \{\text{first is red}\} and B={second is green}B = \{\text{second is green}\}. Are AA and BB independent? (Example 11.7)

  1. 1

    With replacement, each draw is from all 11 balls, so there are 11⋅11=12111\cdot 11 = 121 equally likely ordered outcomes.

  2. 2

    P(A)=411P(A) = \dfrac{4}{11} (first red) and P(B)=711P(B) = \dfrac{7}{11} (second green).

  3. 3

    P(A∩B)=4⋅7121=28121P(A\cap B) = \dfrac{4\cdot 7}{121} = \dfrac{28}{121} (red then green).

  4. 4

    Compare: P(A) P(B)=411⋅711=28121P(A)\,P(B) = \dfrac{4}{11}\cdot\dfrac{7}{11} = \dfrac{28}{121}.

Answer. Since P(A∩B)=28121=P(A) P(B)P(A\cap B) = \dfrac{28}{121} = P(A)\,P(B), the events are independent. Replacing the ball resets the urn, so the first draw tells you nothing about the second.
Example 2

Same urn (4 red, 7 green), but now draw the two balls without replacement. With A={first is red}A = \{\text{first is red}\}, B={second is green}B = \{\text{second is green}\}, are AA and BB independent? (Example 11.7)

Example 3

Pairwise but not mutually independent. Let Ω={(0,0),(0,1),(1,0),(1,1)}\Omega = \{(0,0),(0,1),(1,0),(1,1)\} with each outcome of probability 14\tfrac14. Define A={(1,0),(1,1)}A = \{(1,0),(1,1)\}, B={(0,1),(1,1)}B = \{(0,1),(1,1)\}, C={(0,0),(1,1)}C = \{(0,0),(1,1)\}. Are A,B,CA,B,C mutually independent? (Example 11.8)